I am at a crossroads with Ezra
Pound. How am I to praise his intellect without praising the man? How am I to
claim the genius of his writing without flattering his worldview and political
beliefs? How can I complement his poetry and alienate his ethics at the same
time? This feat shall be difficult, much like the day we “set keel to breakers, forth on the godly sea, and We set up mast and
sail on that swart ship,” but I shall give it my best.
Pound’s use of historical and literal figures
throughout his poetry speaks volumes of his intellect. His ability to infuse
these historical and literary figures into his poetry with ease furthers the
argument that Pound may have indeed had the most impressive literary mind of
his time. Such a case can be made after reading Canto I and furthered with the reading of the remainder works
recorded in The Cantos.
In
Canto I, Pound takes his readers on a
journey with Odysseus as he sets sail to travel into Hades to seek advice from
Tiresias. Pound writes this poem as if he is one of the crew who travels with
Odysseus (He often uses the word “we” when speaking of the crew), which draws
his audience into his poem even more, setting the mood which the audience is to
read the text. In a way to both reach a more vast audience and to pay homage to
Andreas Divus, (The man who translated the Greek epic into Latin) Pound tends
to use the Roman names for the gods as he takes the reader through this Greek
epic. His ability to use this tool successfully, allowing the reader to connect
with the work no matter their bias in mythology, is the most incredible
apologetic to his literary capabilities that he possesses (that is to relate to his audience). His ability to
continue this feat throughout The Cantos
strengthens such a claim.
Though
I exalt Pound’s literary capabilities, it must be made clear that I denounce
his social and political stance. For more on his worldview, I suggest you look
him up. There is not enough room to write on the problems associated with his
worldview.
Hasmukh Amathala’s poem New Approach is political in meaning. I
choose this poem to write on alongside of Pound due to Amathala’s desire to see
change in how politics are handled. Coming from a liberal point of view,
Amthala first claims to seek help for people from their struggles. He continues
to speak on ways that a person can work and strive to better themselves, which
mostly consists of knowing the right people and gaining the benefits of knowing
these people, such as political power and recognition. He argues people will
know you by those you are associated with. His liberal view is prevalent when
he claims he wants to help people but insists that religion is no help at all.
Most religions, whether you agree with them or not, provide hope for the
believers. Hope begins the process of a one striving to be better, so
why say it is a bad thing? pound shared some of these political views.