Thursday, April 3, 2014

The Injustice of That Thing Called Justice

Justice by Langston Hughes may be a short poem, but it is a powerful poem. It is comprised of four lines that are made of a mere twenty six words. In those twenty six words is a message that is big enough to represent an entire era of struggle, hate, and inequality.
            Hughes begins his poem by calling Justice a “blind goddess.” In classic mythology gods and goddesses are known to be removed from the humans, only showing themselves for selfish reasons such as self-glorification, “jumping on the good foot and doing the bad thing” (as quoted from the great philosopher Austin Powers), and to spite fellow gods. One can contend that Hughes is making the statement that justice is removed from the Black peoples, especially in the south. Hughes also describes this removed justice as “blind,” indicating that justice is not just removed from the Black Americans but is also ignorant to this fact. Those who claim to be on the side of justice are far removed from what they claim to uphold and are not even aware of their fallacy. This statement is followed by a line that indicates that the people who are aware of this discrimination are the people who are being discriminated against.
            Lines three and four further the assertion that justice is blind, indicating that justice not only has a bandage covering its eyes, but the eyes are not even there anymore, they have become festering sores. What people claim to be justice is so far removed from the real thing that even if it wanted to change and be restored to what justice is actually supposed to be, it would be a difficult, if not impossible thing to accomplish. Justice is still blind, but maybe Hughes would be happy with the progress that it has made.


Shailja Patel’s ICC Kenya Trails: Witness is a poem about a witness who was blinded by an attacker. The witness asks several questions to gain to try and understand why she was left alive and why she was blinded. She seeks justice to come to the attacker but believes that it will not because she cannot identify who it was. With no sight she has no case. The means of the justice that would come to the attacker is now blind, and thus the justice is removed.


1 comment:

  1. I like the comments you make about justice being blind. There are many people who would argue that justice never had any eyesight. What I really wonder is why people believe in something such as perfect justice, as if imperfect mankind would ever get something as weighty as justice right all the time. Can we really believe in such a thing? I think Hughes would like the progress too, but the idea of absolute justice, or justice as it's supposed to be...I'd go with impossible for that too.

    ReplyDelete